Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
245.7% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

Radeon Pro WX 8200

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌
245.7% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro WX 8200 better than Arc A750?

Yes. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,615 vs 12,600 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while Arc A750 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $289 MSRP. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro WX 8200 is about 245.7% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than Radeon Pro WX 8200?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro WX 8200. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro WX 8200 currently gives you 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 8200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	219 FPS	163 FPS
medium	205 FPS	140 FPS
high	176 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	130 FPS
medium	151 FPS	108 FPS
high	126 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	53 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	50 FPS
medium	84 FPS	43 FPS
high	68 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	27 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	365 FPS	320 FPS
medium	312 FPS	277 FPS
high	235 FPS	213 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	209 FPS
medium	183 FPS	175 FPS
high	143 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	100 FPS
medium	83 FPS	81 FPS
high	68 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	53 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	567 FPS	568 FPS
medium	454 FPS	454 FPS
high	378 FPS	378 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	284 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	426 FPS
medium	340 FPS	341 FPS
high	284 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	213 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	284 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	189 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	142 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
1080p
low	567 FPS	272 FPS
medium	454 FPS	237 FPS
high	378 FPS	202 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	207 FPS
medium	340 FPS	184 FPS
high	284 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	126 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	123 FPS
medium	227 FPS	108 FPS
high	189 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	68 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro WX 8200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon Pro WX 8200

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,615
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 5.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3584	3584
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+60%	10.75 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+60%	1500 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224	224
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCE 4.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	UVD 7.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 2.2% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro WX 8200
TDP	225W-2%	230W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0+2%	54.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 launched at $999. The Arc A750 costs 71.1% less ($710 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Arc A750 offers 246% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).