Arc A750 vs RTX A3000 Mobile

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1230 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,720

+1.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX A3000 Mobile better than Arc A750?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,600 vs 12,720 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer RTX A3000 Mobile is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (70W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021 and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $289 MSRP. RTX A3000 Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. RTX A3000 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than RTX A3000 Mobile?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX A3000 Mobile. The trade-off is that RTX A3000 Mobile currently gives you 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

RTX A3000 Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low	219 FPS	142 FPS
medium	205 FPS	120 FPS
high	176 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	60 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	119 FPS
medium	151 FPS	100 FPS
high	126 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	44 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	43 FPS
medium	84 FPS	39 FPS
high	68 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	20 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open RTX A3000 Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low	373 FPS	188 FPS
medium	317 FPS	149 FPS
high	239 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	129 FPS
medium	180 FPS	104 FPS
high	140 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	70 FPS
medium	79 FPS	56 FPS
high	64 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	35 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open RTX A3000 Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low	567 FPS	572 FPS
medium	454 FPS	458 FPS
high	378 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	429 FPS
medium	340 FPS	343 FPS
high	284 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	286 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	189 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	143 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open RTX A3000 Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
1080p
low	567 FPS	339 FPS
medium	454 FPS	296 FPS
high	378 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	253 FPS
medium	340 FPS	228 FPS
high	284 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	151 FPS
medium	227 FPS	130 FPS
high	189 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	82 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open RTX A3000 Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and RTX A3000 Mobile

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

RTX A3000 Mobile

The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1230 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 32 (RTX A3000 Mobile) with 448 Tensor cores vs 128.

Feature	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,720
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3584	4096+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+71%	10.08 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+95%	1230 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+75%	128
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28	32+14%
Tensor Cores	448+250%	128

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A3000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).

Feature	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	RTX A3000 Mobile
TDP	225W	70W-69%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	181.7+224%