Arc A750 vs GRID RTX6000-1Q

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,617

+0.1%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,010 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2076.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
2079.6% HIGHER MSRP
$6,299 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

GRID RTX6000-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $6,010 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2076.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $6,299 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
2079.6% HIGHER MSRP
$6,299 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($6,299 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GRID RTX6000-1Q better than Arc A750?

Yes. GRID RTX6000-1Q is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,617 vs 12,600 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GRID RTX6000-1Q is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Arc A750 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GRID RTX6000-1Q is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GRID RTX6000-1Q is about 2079.6% more expensive on MSRP at $6,299 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than GRID RTX6000-1Q?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID RTX6000-1Q. The trade-off is that GRID RTX6000-1Q currently gives you 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GRID RTX6000-1Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
1080p
low	219 FPS	137 FPS
medium	205 FPS	116 FPS
high	176 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	115 FPS
medium	151 FPS	97 FPS
high	126 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	40 FPS
medium	84 FPS	36 FPS
high	68 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	19 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GRID RTX6000-1Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
1080p
low	365 FPS	165 FPS
medium	312 FPS	134 FPS
high	235 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	78 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	119 FPS
medium	183 FPS	95 FPS
high	143 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	68 FPS
medium	83 FPS	54 FPS
high	68 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	33 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GRID RTX6000-1Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
1080p
low	567 FPS	568 FPS
medium	454 FPS	454 FPS
high	378 FPS	379 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	284 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	426 FPS
medium	340 FPS	341 FPS
high	284 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	213 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	284 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	189 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	142 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GRID RTX6000-1Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
1080p
low	567 FPS	274 FPS
medium	454 FPS	235 FPS
high	378 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	210 FPS
medium	340 FPS	184 FPS
high	284 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	114 FPS
medium	227 FPS	90 FPS
high	189 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	57 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GRID RTX6000-1Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GRID RTX6000-1Q

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GRID RTX6000-1Q

The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GRID RTX6000-1Q reaches 12,617 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GRID RTX6000-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,617
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+75%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+256%	4.825 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+104%	1178 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+75%	128
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-1Q gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q).

Feature	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GRID RTX6000-1Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GRID RTX6000-1Q
TDP	225W	225W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-8%	85°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	56.1

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299. The Arc A750 costs 95.4% less ($6010 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 2.0 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) — the Arc A750 offers 2080% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).