Arc A750 vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020Core: 1243 MHzBoost: 1499 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

+1.3%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,442

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 75.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
73% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $211 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 75.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 24.9 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 130W instead of 225W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌73.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 130W.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
73% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.9 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A750 better than Radeon Pro 5700 XT?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,600 vs 12,442 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Arc A750 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $289 MSRP. Arc A750 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Arc A750 is about $211 cheaper on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 1.3% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $289 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is Radeon Pro 5700 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5700 XT is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $500 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Arc A750 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5700 XT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	219 FPS	240 FPS
medium	205 FPS	227 FPS
high	176 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	150 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	222 FPS
medium	151 FPS	188 FPS
high	126 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	116 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	117 FPS
medium	84 FPS	98 FPS
high	68 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	64 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	373 FPS	231 FPS
medium	317 FPS	193 FPS
high	239 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	150 FPS
medium	180 FPS	125 FPS
high	140 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	79 FPS
medium	79 FPS	66 FPS
high	64 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	41 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	567 FPS	560 FPS
medium	454 FPS	448 FPS
high	378 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	280 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	420 FPS
medium	340 FPS	336 FPS
high	284 FPS	280 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	280 FPS
medium	227 FPS	224 FPS
high	189 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	140 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
1080p
low	567 FPS	383 FPS
medium	454 FPS	329 FPS
high	378 FPS	276 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	217 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	305 FPS
medium	340 FPS	265 FPS
high	284 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	164 FPS
medium	227 FPS	131 FPS
high	189 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	95 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon Pro 5700 XT

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1499 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
G3D Mark Score	12,600+1%	12,442
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584+40%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+124%	7.675 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+60%	1499 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+40%	160
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	RDNA 1.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	Unified Video Decoder 7.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon Pro 5700 XT
TDP	225W	130W-42%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	78°C	75°C-4%
Perf/Watt	56.0	95.7+71%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500. The Arc A750 costs 42.2% less ($211 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 24.9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Arc A750 offers 75.1% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).