Arc A750 vs Quadro P5000

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Quadro P5000

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,728

+1.0%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,210 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 756% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
764.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

Quadro P5000

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,210 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 756% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
764.7% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P5000 better than Arc A750?

Yes. Quadro P5000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,728 vs 12,600 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro P5000 is a 2016 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Arc A750 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2016, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P5000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P5000 is about 764.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than Quadro P5000?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P5000. The trade-off is that Quadro P5000 currently gives you 1.0% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

Quadro P5000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	219 FPS	205 FPS
medium	205 FPS	188 FPS
high	176 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	150 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	188 FPS
medium	151 FPS	156 FPS
high	126 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	122 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	120 FPS
medium	84 FPS	101 FPS
high	68 FPS	80 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	73 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro P5000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	365 FPS	274 FPS
medium	312 FPS	231 FPS
high	235 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	138 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	180 FPS
medium	183 FPS	153 FPS
high	143 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	105 FPS
medium	83 FPS	87 FPS
high	68 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	55 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro P5000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	567 FPS	573 FPS
medium	454 FPS	458 FPS
high	378 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	430 FPS
medium	340 FPS	344 FPS
high	284 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	215 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	286 FPS
medium	227 FPS	229 FPS
high	189 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	143 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro P5000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
1080p
low	567 FPS	406 FPS
medium	454 FPS	340 FPS
high	378 FPS	287 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	242 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	332 FPS
medium	340 FPS	278 FPS
high	284 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	179 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	179 FPS
medium	227 FPS	139 FPS
high	189 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	104 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro P5000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Quadro P5000

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Quadro P5000

The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1733 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,728+1%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Pascal
Process Node	6 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	3584+75%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+94%	8.873 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+38%	1733 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+40%	160
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 288 GB/s (Quadro P5000) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+78%	288 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	6th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	3rd Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro P5000
TDP	225W	180W-20%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	70.7+26%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The Arc A750 costs 88.4% less ($2210 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the Arc A750 offers 754.9% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).