Arc A750 vs Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

16 GB 80

12,675

+0.6%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Draws 80W instead of 225W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌181.3% higher power demand at 225W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design better than Arc A750?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,600 vs 12,675 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the overall package: you are getting DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, plus much lower power draw (80W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen, and a 6nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $289 MSRP. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design. The trade-off is that Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design currently gives you 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	219 FPS	163 FPS
medium	205 FPS	145 FPS
high	176 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	143 FPS
medium	151 FPS	122 FPS
high	126 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	68 FPS
medium	84 FPS	59 FPS
high	68 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	36 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	373 FPS	193 FPS
medium	317 FPS	158 FPS
high	239 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	143 FPS
medium	180 FPS	114 FPS
high	140 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	79 FPS
medium	79 FPS	64 FPS
high	64 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	42 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	567 FPS	570 FPS
medium	454 FPS	456 FPS
high	378 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	285 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	428 FPS
medium	340 FPS	342 FPS
high	284 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	285 FPS
medium	227 FPS	228 FPS
high	189 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	143 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	567 FPS	247 FPS
medium	454 FPS	214 FPS
high	378 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	189 FPS
medium	340 FPS	167 FPS
high	284 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	112 FPS
medium	227 FPS	94 FPS
high	189 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	58 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1350 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 48 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) with 448 Tensor cores vs 384.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,675
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584+17%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+107%	8.294 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+78%	1350 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+17%	192
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28	48+71%
Tensor Cores	448+17%	384

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	225W	80W-64%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	158.4+183%