Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

6 GB 125

12,692

+0.7%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
26.2% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Arc A750

2022

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 27.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
26.2% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER better than Arc A750?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,600 vs 12,692 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (125W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 6 GB, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 12nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $229 MSRP. GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is about $60 cheaper on MSRP at $229 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.1%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
1080p
low	219 FPS	102 FPS
medium	205 FPS	90 FPS
high	176 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	92 FPS
medium	151 FPS	79 FPS
high	126 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	47 FPS
medium	84 FPS	44 FPS
high	68 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	29 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
1080p
low	373 FPS	265 FPS
medium	317 FPS	228 FPS
high	239 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	130 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	183 FPS
medium	180 FPS	157 FPS
high	140 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	99 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	106 FPS
medium	79 FPS	89 FPS
high	64 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	55 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
1080p
low	567 FPS	533 FPS
medium	454 FPS	444 FPS
high	378 FPS	347 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	428 FPS
medium	340 FPS	343 FPS
high	284 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	286 FPS
medium	227 FPS	228 FPS
high	189 FPS	166 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	126 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
1080p
low	567 FPS	405 FPS
medium	454 FPS	327 FPS
high	378 FPS	263 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	221 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	329 FPS
medium	340 FPS	266 FPS
high	284 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	162 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	157 FPS
medium	227 FPS	118 FPS
high	189 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	84 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER reaches 12,692 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,692
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584+155%	1408
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+242%	5.027 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+34%	1785 MHz
ROPs	112+133%	48
TMUs	224+155%	88
L2 Cache	16 MB+967%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER has 6 GB. The Arc A750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+52%	336 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+967%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC (Turing)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
TDP	225W	125W-44%
Recommended PSU	650W	450W-31%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	8-pin
Length	268mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	75-4%
Perf/Watt	56.0	101.5+81%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 20.8% less ($60 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 27.1% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).