Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1075 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,621

+0.2%

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
245.7% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 245.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
245.7% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX TITAN X better than Arc A750?

Yes. GeForce GTX TITAN X is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 12,621 vs 12,600 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX TITAN X is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Arc A750 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015, 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware, and a 6nm process instead of 28nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX TITAN X is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX TITAN X is about 245.7% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN X?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX TITAN X. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX TITAN X currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX TITAN X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
1080p
low	219 FPS	154 FPS
medium	205 FPS	133 FPS
high	176 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	124 FPS
medium	151 FPS	106 FPS
high	126 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	42 FPS
medium	84 FPS	38 FPS
high	68 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	20 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX TITAN X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
1080p
low	373 FPS	187 FPS
medium	317 FPS	166 FPS
high	239 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	128 FPS
medium	180 FPS	104 FPS
high	140 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	60 FPS
medium	79 FPS	50 FPS
high	64 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	37 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX TITAN X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
1080p
low	567 FPS	568 FPS
medium	454 FPS	454 FPS
high	378 FPS	379 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	284 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	426 FPS
medium	340 FPS	341 FPS
high	284 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	213 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	284 FPS
medium	227 FPS	227 FPS
high	189 FPS	189 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	142 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX TITAN X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
1080p
low	567 FPS	235 FPS
medium	454 FPS	204 FPS
high	378 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	140 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	179 FPS
medium	340 FPS	157 FPS
high	284 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	102 FPS
medium	227 FPS	83 FPS
high	189 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	53 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX TITAN X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce GTX TITAN X

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce GTX TITAN X reaches 12,621 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX TITAN X uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1075 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,621
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+17%	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+157%	6.691 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+123%	1075 MHz
ROPs	112+17%	96
TMUs	224+17%	192
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X has 12 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+52%	336 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit+50%
L2 Cache	16 MB+433%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL 12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 2nd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC 2nd gen
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC 2nd gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX TITAN X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The Arc A750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 83°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX TITAN X
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	650W	600W-8%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	6-pin + 8-pin
Length	268mm	267mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C-6%	83°C
Perf/Watt	56.0+11%	50.5

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999. The Arc A750 costs 71.1% less ($710 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) — the Arc A750 offers 246% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).