Arc A750 vs Radeon RX 5700M

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon RX 5700M

2020Core: 1465 MHzBoost: 1720 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

12,669

+0.5%

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Radeon RX 5700M

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

Radeon RX 5700M

2020

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 5700M better than Arc A750?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,600 vs 12,669 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 5700M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation, plus much lower power draw (180W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation, and a 6nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $289 MSRP. Radeon RX 5700M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 5700M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than Radeon RX 5700M?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 5700M. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 5700M currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Arc A750 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 5700M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	219 FPS	195 FPS
medium	205 FPS	181 FPS
high	176 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	121 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	163 FPS
medium	151 FPS	136 FPS
high	126 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	84 FPS
medium	84 FPS	71 FPS
high	68 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	50 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon RX 5700M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	373 FPS	269 FPS
medium	317 FPS	224 FPS
high	239 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	160 FPS
medium	180 FPS	131 FPS
high	140 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	86 FPS
medium	79 FPS	70 FPS
high	64 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	40 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon RX 5700M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	567 FPS	570 FPS
medium	454 FPS	456 FPS
high	378 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	285 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	428 FPS
medium	340 FPS	342 FPS
high	284 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	285 FPS
medium	227 FPS	228 FPS
high	189 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	143 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon RX 5700M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
1080p
low	567 FPS	432 FPS
medium	454 FPS	361 FPS
high	378 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	360 FPS
medium	340 FPS	303 FPS
high	284 FPS	239 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	194 FPS
medium	227 FPS	155 FPS
high	189 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	116 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open Radeon RX 5700M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon RX 5700M

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon RX 5700M

The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon RX 5700M reaches 12,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 5700M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
G3D Mark Score	12,600	12,669
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584+56%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+117%	7.926 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+40%	1720 MHz
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+56%	144
L2 Cache	16 MB+100%	8 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) — a 33.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+33%	384 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+100%	8 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M).

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	VCN 2.0
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5700M's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5700M). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A750	Radeon RX 5700M
TDP	225W	180W-20%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	78°C-8%	85°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	70.4+26%