Quadro 4000M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

1287

G3D Mark Score

10186

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 691.5% faster than Quadro 4000M

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Quadro 4000M2048 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

2 GB VRAM Β· 1,287 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLimited. Older/lighter games only.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
37%
low76%
medium58%
high38%
ultra15%
1440pLow
20%
low58%
medium38%
high15%
ultra5%
4KLimited
10%
low38%
medium15%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 10,186 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER performs 691.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Quadro 4000M and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Quadro 4000M and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. Core clock: 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:56
Vram:2048 MB
L1 Cache:448 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:475 MHz
Shading Units:336
Transistor Count:1,950 million
Texture Fill Rate:26.60
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:0.6384 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF104
Architecture:Fermi (2010βˆ’2014)
Launch Price:$449
Release Date:February 22 2011
Performance Ranking Position:801
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:1.3 MB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:1530 MHz
Boost Clock:1725 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:6,600 million
Texture Fill Rate:138.0
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.416 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU116
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Release Date:November 22 2019
Performance Ranking Position:258

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 4000M and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER