
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅86.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅86.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 4060

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 91.9%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 19,548+92% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 3072+140% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+242% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2460 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 3 MB+131% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 41.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 272 GB/s+42% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 24 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 14% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-13% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 170.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 46.8% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-47% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1 | 65.4+2% |
| Codename | TU116 | AD107 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #258 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











