
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

L4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,186 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1379.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 72W.
- ❌35.5% longer card at 229mm vs 169mm.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 100W, a 28W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 229mm, a 60mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌1374.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,186 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1379.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 100W, a 28W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 229mm, a 60mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌38.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 72W.
- ❌35.5% longer card at 229mm vs 169mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌1374.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than L4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L4 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 93 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and L4

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

L4
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 and the L4 reaches 10,153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 7424+480% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 30.29 TFLOPS+586% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2040 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 240+200% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 7.5 MB+477% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the L4 has 8 GB. The L4 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the L4's 72W — a 32.6% difference. The L4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 169mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 72W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 169mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 141.0+38% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the L4 launched at $2345. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 93.2% less ($2186 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4.3 (L4) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 1390.7% better value. The L4 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-93% | $2345 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1+1391% | 4.3 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD104 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #258 | #259 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











