
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅6.1% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.3% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅6.1% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.3% HIGHER MSRP$169 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 5.5%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 10,749+6% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2304+80% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+17% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+11% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 2.3 MB+77% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+14% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 153.6+51% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 5.9% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 0.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-6% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1 | 63.6 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA107 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #258 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











