G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $441 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 255% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
277.4% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $441 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 255% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 80W instead of 100W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌25% higher power demand at 100W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌
277.4% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?

Yes. Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 18.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 6.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is about 277.4% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 18.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 6.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $159 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	96 FPS	93 FPS
medium	85 FPS	81 FPS
high	72 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	78 FPS
medium	75 FPS	69 FPS
high	62 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	34 FPS
4K
low	43 FPS	28 FPS
medium	41 FPS	27 FPS
high	30 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	200 FPS	241 FPS
medium	171 FPS	194 FPS
high	135 FPS	159 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	133 FPS
1440p
low	140 FPS	185 FPS
medium	115 FPS	147 FPS
high	94 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	96 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	107 FPS
medium	68 FPS	88 FPS
high	56 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	379 FPS	455 FPS
medium	333 FPS	390 FPS
high	246 FPS	325 FPS
ultra	205 FPS	244 FPS
1440p
low	308 FPS	325 FPS
medium	272 FPS	283 FPS
high	207 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	183 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	218 FPS
medium	161 FPS	182 FPS
high	108 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	77 FPS	104 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	270 FPS	162 FPS
medium	218 FPS	133 FPS
high	195 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	206 FPS	117 FPS
medium	163 FPS	99 FPS
high	139 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	71 FPS
medium	76 FPS	59 FPS
high	67 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Open Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 945 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,829 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 10,829 — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) leads by 6.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2,304 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 6.359 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1380 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	10,186	10,829+6%
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280	2304+80%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.416 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS+44%
Boost Clock	1725 MHz+25%	1380 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	80	144+80%
L1 Cache	1.3 MB	2.3 MB+77%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
DirectX	12.1	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+30%	1.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)'s 80W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)
TDP	100W	80W-20%
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	101.9	135.4+33%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel) launched at $600. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 73.5% less ($441 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 18.0 (Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 256.1% better value.