
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 60W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 100W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 100W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 60W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile make more sense than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2023. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1237 MHz to 1492 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,125 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 and the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile reaches 10,125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1492 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 10,125 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2560+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+16% | 1492 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER. Bus width: 128-bit vs 96-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+14% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile's 60W — a 50% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 60W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 168.8+66% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | GN20-P0-R 6 GB |
| Release | November 22 2019 | January 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #258 | #271 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











