
Quadro 4000M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8790M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8790M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro 4000M
2011Radeon HD 8790M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 8790M better than Quadro 4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro 4000M make more sense than Radeon HD 8790M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 8790M

Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon HD 8790M
Radeon HD 8790M
The Radeon HD 8790M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,306 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon HD 8790M reaches 1,306 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 8790M uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8790M). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8790M).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,287 | 1,306+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 384+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6384 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+8% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 56+133% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+367% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8790M) — the Quadro 4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 8790M's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon HD 8790M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8790M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 8790M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 26.1+102% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













