Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R7 A370

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A370

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Radeon R7 A370

2015

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro 4000M better than Radeon R7 A370?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,287 vs 1,281 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro 4000M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 4000M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 2 GB instead of 512 MB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro 4000M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro 4000M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 A370 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon R7 A370 make more sense than Quadro 4000M?

Yes. Radeon R7 A370 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro 4000M. The trade-off is that Quadro 4000M currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 A370 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 4000M Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 A370 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
1080p
low	51 FPS	58 FPS
medium	41 FPS	46 FPS
high	25 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	28 FPS	43 FPS
medium	21 FPS	35 FPS
high	12 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	22 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	23 FPS
medium	9 FPS	22 FPS
high	5 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	12 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon R7 A370

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
1080p
low	58 FPS	58 FPS
medium	46 FPS	46 FPS
high	39 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	43 FPS
medium	29 FPS	35 FPS
high	20 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	18 FPS	23 FPS
medium	11 FPS	16 FPS
high	9 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	9 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon R7 A370

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
1080p
low	58 FPS	58 FPS
medium	46 FPS	46 FPS
high	39 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	43 FPS	43 FPS
medium	35 FPS	35 FPS
high	29 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	22 FPS	22 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	29 FPS
medium	23 FPS	23 FPS
high	19 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	14 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon R7 A370

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
1080p
low	58 FPS	58 FPS
medium	46 FPS	46 FPS
high	39 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	29 FPS
1440p
low	15 FPS	43 FPS
medium	13 FPS	35 FPS
high	11 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	9 FPS	22 FPS
4K
low	11 FPS	29 FPS
medium	8 FPS	23 FPS
high	7 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	14 FPS

Open Quadro 4000M Open Radeon R7 A370

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and Radeon R7 A370

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon R7 A370

The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon R7 A370 reaches 1,281 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 A370 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370).

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
G3D Mark Score	1,287	1,281
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	336	1024+205%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6384 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+213%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	56	64+14%
L1 Cache	448 KB+75%	256 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 4000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A370 has 512 MB. The Quadro 4000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro 4000M	Radeon R7 A370
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 A370's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R7 A370 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A370). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.