
Quadro 4000M
Popular choices:

Radeon Vega 6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Radeon Vega 6
2021Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro 4000M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro 4000M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2021-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro 4000M
2011Radeon Vega 6
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro 4000M: it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro 4000M is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2021-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Vega 6 better than Quadro 4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro 4000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and Radeon Vega 6

Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon Vega 6
Radeon Vega 6
The Radeon Vega 6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon Vega 6 reaches 1,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon Vega 6 uses GCN 5.1, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 6). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 6).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,287 | 1,309+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 448+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6384 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+167% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 56+100% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 6 has 0 MB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Vega 6's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon Vega 6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 6). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 45W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9 | 29.1+126% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 6 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon Vega 6 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GF104 | Cezanne |
| Release | February 22 2011 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #801 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













