
Quadro 4000M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 4870 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro 4000M
2011Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 286W, a 186W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4870 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌186% higher power demand at 286W vs 100W.
Quadro 4000M
2011Radeon HD 4870 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 286W, a 186W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Fermi (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($550 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $550 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌186% higher power demand at 286W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 4870 X2 better than Quadro 4000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro 4000M make more sense than Radeon HD 4870 X2?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 13 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 4000M and Radeon HD 4870 X2

Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M
The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Radeon HD 4870 X2
Radeon HD 4870 X2
The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 286W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,309 points. Launch price was $550.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 4000M scores 1,287 and the Radeon HD 4870 X2 reaches 1,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 4000M is built on Fermi while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 336 (Quadro 4000M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4870 X2). Raw compute: 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M) vs 1.12 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4870 X2).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,287 | 1,309+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 336 | 800 ×2+138% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6384 TFLOPS | 1.12 TFLOPS ×2+75% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+180% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 4000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4870 X2 has 1 GB. The Quadro 4000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 4000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4870 X2) — the Quadro 4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 4870 X2's 286W — a 96.4% difference. The Quadro 4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 4000M) vs 650W (Radeon HD 4870 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-65% | 286W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.9+180% | 4.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 4000M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro 4000M | Radeon HD 4870 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $550 |
| Codename | GF104 | R700 |
| Release | February 22 2011 | August 12 2008 |
| Ranking | #801 | #796 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













