GeForce 930MX vs Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA

GeForce 930MX

2016Core: 952 MHzBoost: 1020 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

2011Core: 475 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce 930MX

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 17W instead of 100W, a 83W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro 4000M across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quadro 4000M

2011

Why buy it

  • 48.9% more average FPS across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 488.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 17W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro 4000M better than GeForce 930MX?
Yes. Quadro 4000M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 48.9% more average FPS across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.7% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2011 instead of 2016, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 930MX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2016 generation instead of 2011 and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro 4000M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro 4000M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and you are getting 48.9% more estimated average FPS across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce 930MX really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce 930MX make more sense than Quadro 4000M?
Yes. GeForce 930MX is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (17W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $80 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro 4000M. The trade-off is that Quadro 4000M currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark and 48.9% more estimated average FPS across 25 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce 930MX still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
1080p
low26 FPS41 FPS
medium16 FPS33 FPS
high11 FPS20 FPS
ultra6 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS23 FPS
medium10 FPS17 FPS
high5 FPS9 FPS
ultra3 FPS6 FPS
4K
low7 FPS10 FPS
medium5 FPS8 FPS
high3 FPS5 FPS
ultra2 FPS4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
1080p
low58 FPS58 FPS
medium35 FPS46 FPS
high25 FPS39 FPS
ultra16 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low19 FPS43 FPS
medium12 FPS29 FPS
high8 FPS20 FPS
ultra6 FPS15 FPS
4K
low5 FPS18 FPS
medium3 FPS11 FPS
high3 FPS9 FPS
ultra2 FPS6 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
1080p
low58 FPS58 FPS
medium46 FPS46 FPS
high38 FPS39 FPS
ultra29 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low43 FPS43 FPS
medium35 FPS35 FPS
high29 FPS29 FPS
ultra22 FPS22 FPS
4K
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium23 FPS23 FPS
high19 FPS19 FPS
ultra14 FPS14 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
1080p
low58 FPS58 FPS
medium46 FPS46 FPS
high38 FPS39 FPS
ultra29 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low14 FPS14 FPS
medium11 FPS11 FPS
high10 FPS10 FPS
ultra8 FPS8 FPS
4K
low10 FPS10 FPS
medium7 FPS7 FPS
high6 FPS6 FPS
ultra5 FPS4 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 930MX and Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA

GeForce 930MX

The GeForce 930MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1020 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 17W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,278 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro 4000M

The Quadro 4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 475 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,287 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 930MX scores 1,278 and the Quadro 4000M reaches 1,287 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 930MX is built on Maxwell while the Quadro 4000M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 930MX) vs 336 (Quadro 4000M). Raw compute: 0.7834 TFLOPS (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.6384 TFLOPS (Quadro 4000M).

FeatureGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
G3D Mark Score
1,278
1,287
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+14%
336
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7834 TFLOPS+23%
0.6384 TFLOPS
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
56+133%
L1 Cache
192 KB
448 KB+133%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 930MX gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 4000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 930MX) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 4000M) — the GeForce 930MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 930MX draws 17W versus the Quadro 4000M's 100W — a 141.9% difference. The GeForce 930MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 930MX) vs 350W (Quadro 4000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
TDP
17W-83%
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
75.2+483%
12.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 930MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 930MXQuadro 4000M
MSRP
$80
Codename
GM108
GF104
Release
March 1 2016
February 22 2011
Ranking
#805
#801