GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 370

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

10186

G3D Mark Score

4722

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is 115.7% faster than Radeon R9 370

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER4096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
37%
low76%
medium58%
high38%
ultra15%
1440pLow
20%
low58%
medium38%
high15%
ultra5%
4KLimited
10%
low38%
medium15%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 10,186 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon R9 3704096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
13%
low60%
medium20%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
7%
low30%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 4,722 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER performs 115.7% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 370.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 370

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:1.3 MB
L2 Cache:1024 kB
Core Clock:1530 MHz
Boost Clock:1725 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:6,600 million
Texture Fill Rate:138.0
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):100 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.416 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU116
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Release Date:November 22 2019
Performance Ranking Position:258
AMD

Radeon R9 370

The Radeon R9 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 975 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,722 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:32
TMUs:80
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:384 kB
L2 Cache:512 kB
Core Clock:925 MHz
Boost Clock:975 MHz
Shading Units:1280
Transistor Count:2,800 million
Texture Fill Rate:78.00
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):110 Watt
Floating Point Performance:2.496 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Trinidad
Architecture:GCN 1.0 (2012βˆ’2020)
Release Date:May 5 2015
Performance Ranking Position:456

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and Radeon R9 370