GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1725 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4070
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 42.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 44.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
  • Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

  • 192.2% more average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 276.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
  • 32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 192.2% more FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 10,186 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 164.3% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce RTX 4070 is about 276.7% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 192.2% more estimated average FPS across 13 tracked games in our benchmark data and 164.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4070 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.
Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $159 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4070 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low96 FPS183 FPS
medium85 FPS167 FPS
high72 FPS151 FPS
ultra60 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS150 FPS
medium75 FPS124 FPS
high62 FPS110 FPS
ultra52 FPS101 FPS
4K
low43 FPS92 FPS
medium41 FPS78 FPS
high30 FPS65 FPS
ultra26 FPS58 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low200 FPS544 FPS
medium171 FPS454 FPS
high135 FPS353 FPS
ultra102 FPS299 FPS
1440p
low140 FPS351 FPS
medium115 FPS288 FPS
high94 FPS235 FPS
ultra76 FPS197 FPS
4K
low81 FPS172 FPS
medium68 FPS144 FPS
high56 FPS125 FPS
ultra44 FPS101 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low379 FPS884 FPS
medium333 FPS713 FPS
high246 FPS643 FPS
ultra205 FPS569 FPS
1440p
low308 FPS684 FPS
medium272 FPS549 FPS
high207 FPS483 FPS
ultra169 FPS424 FPS
4K
low187 FPS467 FPS
medium161 FPS373 FPS
high108 FPS326 FPS
ultra77 FPS277 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low270 FPS751 FPS
medium218 FPS612 FPS
high195 FPS536 FPS
ultra169 FPS497 FPS
1440p
low206 FPS615 FPS
medium163 FPS500 FPS
high139 FPS433 FPS
ultra116 FPS395 FPS
4K
low100 FPS384 FPS
medium76 FPS324 FPS
high67 FPS301 FPS
ultra52 FPS272 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 4070

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 164.3%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score
10,186
26,919+164%
Architecture
Turing
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
12 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
1280
5888+360%
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.416 TFLOPS
29.15 TFLOPS+560%
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
2475 MHz+43%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
184+130%
L1 Cache
1.3 MB
5.8 MB+346%
L2 Cache
1 MB
36 MB+3500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
12 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
504 GB/s+163%
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB
36 MB+3500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
Encoder
7th Gen NVENC
8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
TDP
100W-50%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-46%
650W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
229mm
304mm
Height
111mm
137mm
Slots
2-33%
3
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
101.9
134.6+32%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 73.5% less ($440 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 42.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce RTX 4070
MSRP
$159-73%
$599
Performance per Dollar
64.1+43%
44.9
Codename
TU116
AD104
Release
November 22 2019
April 12 2023
Ranking
#258
#32