
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅9.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 88 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 80 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 10,119 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+25% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS+45% | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+16% | 1485 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80+25% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB+30% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile). Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 202.4+99% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | TU116 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | April 23 2020 |
| Ranking | #258 | #324 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











