
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
2025Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
2025GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 64.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 379 FPS |
| medium | 377 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 314 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 77 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 417 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,465 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) scores 10,465 and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER reaches 10,186 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on 4 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,465+3% | 10,186 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+260% | 1280 |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+46% | 1725 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile). Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+33% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-50% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 209.3+105% | 101.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 (Mobile) | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Codename | GN22-X6 | TU116 |
| Release | January 2 2025 | November 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #não classificado | #258 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












