
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅133.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.9% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 12.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 64.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅133.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌150.9% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 64.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 333 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 218 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER scores 10,186 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 122.4%. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,186 | 22,651+122% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4352+240% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.416 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+400% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2535 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 80 | 136+70% |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 4.3 MB+231% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 288 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 32 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER draws 100W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-38% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.9 | 141.6+39% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 60.2% less ($240 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 64.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 12.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159-60% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 64.1+13% | 56.8 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD106 |
| Release | November 22 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #258 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











