
Arc A750
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅46.4% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
- ❌11.2% longer card at 268mm vs 241mm.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 268mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Arc A750
2022Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅46.4% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 268mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
- ❌11.2% longer card at 268mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A750 better than Radeon RX 5600 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5600 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the Radeon RX 5600 OEM reaches 12,333 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600+2% | 12,333 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+169% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+54% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+75% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5600 OEM is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+78% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 40% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-3% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 82.2+47% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A750 | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | — |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 10 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #212 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













