Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4070

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

••••••RTX 4070•••

GeForce RTX 4070

2023Core: 1920 MHzBoost: 2475 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

26,919

+113.6%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

GeForce RTX 5060

RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 5070

GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 268mm instead of 304mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅29.5% more average FPS across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌13.4% longer card at 304mm vs 268mm.

Arc A750

2022

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $310 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Measures 268mm instead of 304mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅29.5% more average FPS across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌13.4% longer card at 304mm vs 268mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Arc A750?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4070 averages 29.5% more FPS across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 12,600 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Arc A750 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 113.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 8 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is about 107.3% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 29.5% more estimated average FPS across 32 tracked games in our benchmark data and 113.6% higher G3D Mark. It only holds a slight 3.1% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Arc A750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Arc A750 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $289 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4070 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	219 FPS	183 FPS
medium	205 FPS	167 FPS
high	176 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	150 FPS
medium	151 FPS	124 FPS
high	126 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	92 FPS
medium	84 FPS	78 FPS
high	68 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	58 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	365 FPS	544 FPS
medium	312 FPS	454 FPS
high	235 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	351 FPS
medium	183 FPS	288 FPS
high	143 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	172 FPS
medium	83 FPS	144 FPS
high	68 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	101 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	567 FPS	884 FPS
medium	454 FPS	713 FPS
high	378 FPS	643 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	684 FPS
medium	340 FPS	549 FPS
high	284 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	467 FPS
medium	227 FPS	373 FPS
high	189 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	277 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	567 FPS	751 FPS
medium	454 FPS	612 FPS
high	378 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	615 FPS
medium	340 FPS	500 FPS
high	284 FPS	433 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	384 FPS
medium	227 FPS	324 FPS
high	189 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	272 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4070

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 113.6%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2475 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 4070) with 448 Tensor cores vs 184.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	12,600	26,919+114%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3584	5888+64%
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+69%
Boost Clock	2400 MHz	2475 MHz+3%
ROPs	112+75%	64
TMUs	224+22%	184
L2 Cache	16 MB	36 MB+125%
Ray Tracing Cores	28	46+64%
Tensor Cores	448+143%	184

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 1.6% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+2%	504 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB	36 MB+125%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	225W	200W-11%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	8-pin
Length	268mm	304mm
Height	—	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	78°C-3%	80°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	134.6+140%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The Arc A750 costs 51.8% less ($310 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 offers 3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).