Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

••RTX 4060 Ti•••••••

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

22,651

+79.8%

GeForce GTX TITAN X

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU

TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 3080

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+79.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 30.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Arc A750

2022

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅+79.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 30.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Arc A750?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 79.8% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2022, 79.8% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 38.1% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 79.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 30.2%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Arc A750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Arc A750 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $289 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	219 FPS	177 FPS
medium	205 FPS	162 FPS
high	176 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	124 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	143 FPS
medium	151 FPS	118 FPS
high	126 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	93 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	93 FPS
medium	84 FPS	79 FPS
high	68 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	59 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	365 FPS	433 FPS
medium	312 FPS	363 FPS
high	235 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	240 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	278 FPS
medium	183 FPS	238 FPS
high	143 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	161 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	123 FPS
medium	83 FPS	102 FPS
high	68 FPS	84 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	65 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	567 FPS	855 FPS
medium	454 FPS	693 FPS
high	378 FPS	609 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	510 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	660 FPS
medium	340 FPS	527 FPS
high	284 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	382 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	447 FPS
medium	227 FPS	355 FPS
high	189 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	255 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
1080p
low	567 FPS	775 FPS
medium	454 FPS	639 FPS
high	378 FPS	558 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	492 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	613 FPS
medium	340 FPS	503 FPS
high	284 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	378 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	375 FPS
medium	227 FPS	322 FPS
high	189 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	255 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 79.8%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) with 448 Tensor cores vs 136.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	12,600	22,651+80%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3584	4352+21%
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS	22.06 TFLOPS+28%
Boost Clock	2400 MHz	2535 MHz+6%
ROPs	112+133%	48
TMUs	224+65%	136
L2 Cache	16 MB	32 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores	28	34+21%
Tensor Cores	448+229%	136

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 77.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+78%	288 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB	32 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
TDP	225W	160W-29%
Recommended PSU	650W	550W-15%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	8-pin
Length	268mm	240mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	70°C-10%
Perf/Watt	56.0	141.6+153%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The Arc A750 costs 27.6% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 30.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).