
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 50% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Arc A750
2022GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 50% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 37 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Arc A750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Arc A750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 55 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 211 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 812 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 186 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 440 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 220 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 4060

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 55.1%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 448 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 19,548+55% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+14% | 15.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 2460 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+133% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+17% | 24 |
| Tensor Cores | 448+367% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A750 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) — a 88.2% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+88% | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 115W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 73°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 170.0+204% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. The Arc A750 costs 3.3% less ($10 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 50% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-3% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6 | 65.4+50% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | AD107 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #212 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













