
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌10.7% longer card at 268mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+76% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 268mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Arc A750
2022GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+76% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 268mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌10.7% longer card at 268mm vs 242mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Arc A750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc A750 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3070

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 76%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 448 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 22,172+76% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5888+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+39% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+17% | 96 |
| TMUs | 224+22% | 184 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 46+64% |
| Tensor Cores | 448+143% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+14% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 2.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 220W-2% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 100.8+80% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The Arc A750 costs 42.1% less ($210 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1.8% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-42% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6 | 44.4+2% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #212 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













