Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••RTX 3060 Ti••••

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

20,312

+61.2%

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

RTX 5000 Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 20,312).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌10.7% longer card at 268mm vs 242mm.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+61.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 16.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Measures 242mm instead of 268mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Arc A750

2022

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅+61.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 16.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Measures 242mm instead of 268mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 20,312).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌10.7% longer card at 268mm vs 242mm.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Arc A750?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 61.2% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2020 instead of 2022, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2020, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 6nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 38.1% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 61.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.8%. Arc A750 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Arc A750 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

Yes. Arc A750 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $289 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti currently gives you 61.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 16.8%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	219 FPS	152 FPS
medium	205 FPS	137 FPS
high	176 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	131 FPS
medium	151 FPS	107 FPS
high	126 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	77 FPS
medium	84 FPS	65 FPS
high	68 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	43 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	373 FPS	425 FPS
medium	317 FPS	366 FPS
high	239 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	272 FPS
medium	180 FPS	229 FPS
high	140 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	96 FPS	133 FPS
medium	79 FPS	114 FPS
high	64 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	73 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	567 FPS	859 FPS
medium	454 FPS	693 FPS
high	378 FPS	602 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	658 FPS
medium	340 FPS	529 FPS
high	284 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	434 FPS
medium	227 FPS	346 FPS
high	189 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	221 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	567 FPS	580 FPS
medium	454 FPS	514 FPS
high	378 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	478 FPS
medium	340 FPS	427 FPS
high	284 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	285 FPS
medium	227 FPS	266 FPS
high	189 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	195 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 61.2%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 448 Tensor cores vs 152.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	12,600	20,312+61%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3584	4864+36%
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+6%	16.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+44%	1665 MHz
ROPs	112+40%	80
TMUs	224+47%	152
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28	38+36%
Tensor Cores	448+195%	152

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+14%	448 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+300%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	225W	200W-11%
Recommended PSU	650W	600W-8%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	8-pin
Length	268mm	242mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	75-4%
Perf/Watt	56.0	101.6+81%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The Arc A750 costs 27.6% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 16.7% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).