
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Arc A750
2022GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Arc A750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Arc A750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 48 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 444 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 222 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU reaches 13,170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) with 448 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 13,170+5% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+35% | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+35% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 448+300% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The Arc A750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+52% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU's 170W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 170W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 268mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 77.5+38% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













