
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+34.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 18.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Arc A750
2022GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+34.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 18.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Arc A750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc A750 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3060

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 34.9%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 448 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 16,995+35% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+35% | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+35% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 448+300% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 42.2% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+42% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 170W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 75-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 100.0+79% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The Arc A750 costs 12.2% less ($40 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 18.6% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-12% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6 | 51.7+19% |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA106 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #212 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













