Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

+17.2%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

10,749

0.0%

GeForce GTX 770

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce RTX 3080

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅60.0% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌
71% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
❌67.5% longer card at 268mm vs 160mm.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 160mm instead of 268mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Arc A750

2022

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅60.0% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 45.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 70W instead of 225W, a 155W reduction.
✅Measures 160mm instead of 268mm, a 108mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌
71% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌221.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 70W.
❌67.5% longer card at 268mm vs 160mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A750 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?

Yes. Arc A750 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 60.0% more average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data, 17.2% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2024, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2022 and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 is about 71.0% more expensive on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 60.0% more estimated average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data and 17.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Arc A750 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than Arc A750?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Arc A750. The trade-off is that Arc A750 currently gives you 17.2% higher G3D Mark and 60.0% more estimated average FPS across 35 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	219 FPS	85 FPS
medium	205 FPS	72 FPS
high	176 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	74 FPS
medium	151 FPS	64 FPS
high	126 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	30 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	27 FPS
medium	84 FPS	25 FPS
high	68 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	15 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	365 FPS	174 FPS
medium	312 FPS	149 FPS
high	235 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	129 FPS
medium	183 FPS	106 FPS
high	143 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	74 FPS
medium	83 FPS	62 FPS
high	68 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	34 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	567 FPS	484 FPS
medium	454 FPS	387 FPS
high	378 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	242 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	363 FPS
medium	340 FPS	290 FPS
high	284 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	242 FPS
medium	227 FPS	193 FPS
high	189 FPS	161 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	121 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
1080p
low	567 FPS	243 FPS
medium	454 FPS	210 FPS
high	378 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	185 FPS
medium	340 FPS	166 FPS
high	284 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	104 FPS
medium	227 FPS	87 FPS
high	189 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	55 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the Arc A750 leads by 17.2%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 448 Tensor cores vs 72.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	12,600+17%	10,749
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Ampere
Process Node	6 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3584+56%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+154%	6.774 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+63%	1470 MHz
ROPs	112+250%	32
TMUs	224+211%	72
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28+56%	18
Tensor Cores	448+522%	72

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The Arc A750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 204.8% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+205%	168 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+167%	96-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 105.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs None. Card length: 268mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	225W	70W-69%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	None
Length	268mm	160mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	75°C-4%
Perf/Watt	56.0	153.6+174%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 41.5% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 45.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).