Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅55.4% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Arc A750

2022

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅55.4% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 43.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A750 better than GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)?

Yes. Arc A750 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 55.4% more average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2025, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Arc A750 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $289 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 55.4% more estimated average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 225W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) make more sense than Arc A750?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 225W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Arc A750. The trade-off is that Arc A750 currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark and 55.4% more estimated average FPS across 27 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
1080p
low	219 FPS	134 FPS
medium	205 FPS	116 FPS
high	176 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	85 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	118 FPS
medium	151 FPS	95 FPS
high	126 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	66 FPS
medium	84 FPS	58 FPS
high	68 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	36 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
1080p
low	365 FPS	198 FPS
medium	312 FPS	153 FPS
high	235 FPS	106 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	73 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	122 FPS
medium	183 FPS	82 FPS
high	143 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	48 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	56 FPS
medium	83 FPS	41 FPS
high	68 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	26 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
1080p
low	567 FPS	556 FPS
medium	454 FPS	445 FPS
high	378 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	278 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	417 FPS
medium	340 FPS	334 FPS
high	284 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	209 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	278 FPS
medium	227 FPS	222 FPS
high	189 FPS	185 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	139 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
1080p
low	567 FPS	438 FPS
medium	454 FPS	355 FPS
high	378 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	243 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	352 FPS
medium	340 FPS	280 FPS
high	284 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	172 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	165 FPS
medium	227 FPS	126 FPS
high	189 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	93 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) reaches 12,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 4,608 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 2520 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
G3D Mark Score	12,600+2%	12,357
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	3584	4608+29%
Boost Clock	2400 MHz	2520 MHz+5%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+14%	448 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)'s 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce RTX 2070 (Mobile)
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	268mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	78°C-8%	85°C
Perf/Watt	56.0	247.1+341%