
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $511 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 15.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌176.8% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Arc A750
2022GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $511 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 182.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 43.6 vs 15.4 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 225W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌95.7% higher power demand at 225W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌176.8% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A750 better than GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 278 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 94 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1305 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,357 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A750 scores 12,600 and the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) reaches 12,357 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.843 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1485 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 36 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) with 448 Tensor cores vs 288.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600+2% | 12,357 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+151% | 6.843 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+62% | 1485 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+56% | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 36+29% |
| Tensor Cores | 448+56% | 288 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) — a 14.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+14% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+300% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)'s 115W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 115W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 107.5+92% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) launched at $800. The Arc A750 costs 63.9% less ($511 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 15.4 (GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)) — the Arc A750 offers 183.1% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-64% | $800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6+183% | 15.4 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU106B |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 29 2019 |
| Ranking | #212 | #195 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













