
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
- ❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅+12% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌20.8% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
Arc A750
2022GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅+12% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 225W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,600 vs 14,114).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌40.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 160W.
- ❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Arc A750 across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Arc A750 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌20.8% HIGHER MSRP$349 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A750 better than GeForce RTX 2060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 172 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce RTX 2060

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 12%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Arc A750) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 448 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600 | 14,114+12% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+87% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+167% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+43% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+133% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+87% | 120 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 30+7% |
| Tensor Cores | 448+87% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The Arc A750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 52.4% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+52% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+433% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 72.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 160W-29% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 72-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 88.2+58% |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The Arc A750 costs 17.2% less ($60 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the Arc A750 offers 7.9% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-17% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6+8% | 40.4 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | TU106 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #212 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













