Arc A750 vs GeForce GTX 1650

CPU

GPU

Arc A750

2022Core: 2050 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

••••GTX 1650•••••

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc A750

8 GB 225

12,600

+60.1%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

7,869

0.0%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A750

2022

Why buy it

✅+60.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
94% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 21.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 12,600).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Arc A750

2022

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

✅+60.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Delivers 21.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 43.6 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 268mm, a 39mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
94% HIGHER MSRP
$289 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 43.6 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
❌17% longer card at 268mm vs 229mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,869 vs 12,600).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Quick Answers

So, is Arc A750 better than GeForce GTX 1650?

Yes. Arc A750 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 60.1% higher PassMark G3D performance and 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2022 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A750 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019, 60.1% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and 100.0% more ray-tracing hardware. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Arc A750 is about 94.0% more expensive on MSRP at $289 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 60.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1650 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Arc A750 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1650 still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $149 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Arc A750 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A750 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	219 FPS	94 FPS
medium	205 FPS	83 FPS
high	176 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	58 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	87 FPS
medium	151 FPS	74 FPS
high	126 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	98 FPS	41 FPS
medium	84 FPS	39 FPS
high	68 FPS	27 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	24 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	365 FPS	136 FPS
medium	312 FPS	113 FPS
high	235 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	172 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	214 FPS	79 FPS
medium	183 FPS	62 FPS
high	143 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	36 FPS
medium	83 FPS	27 FPS
high	68 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	15 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	567 FPS	323 FPS
medium	454 FPS	283 FPS
high	378 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	225 FPS
medium	340 FPS	202 FPS
high	284 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	130 FPS
medium	227 FPS	117 FPS
high	189 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	50 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1650

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
1080p
low	567 FPS	261 FPS
medium	454 FPS	211 FPS
high	378 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	166 FPS
1440p
low	425 FPS	201 FPS
medium	340 FPS	158 FPS
high	284 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	99 FPS
medium	227 FPS	74 FPS
high	189 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	51 FPS

Open Arc A750 Open GeForce GTX 1650

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce GTX 1650

Arc A750

The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the Arc A750 leads by 60.1%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	12,600+60%	7,869
Architecture	Generation 12.7	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3584+300%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	17.2 TFLOPS+476%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+44%	1665 MHz
ROPs	112+250%	32
TMUs	224+300%	56
L2 Cache	16 MB+1500%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Arc A750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	512 GB/s+300%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	16 MB+1500%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	Dual Xe Media Engine	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	Xe Media Engine	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs None. Card length: 268mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Arc A750	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	650W	300W-54%
Power Connector	8-pin + 6-pin	None
Length	268mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	78°C	70°C-10%
Perf/Watt	56.0	104.9+87%

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 48.4% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 21.1% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).