
Arc A750
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A750
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
- ❌54.9% longer card at 268mm vs 173mm.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 268mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,600).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Arc A750
2022GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅+25.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 225W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 173mm instead of 268mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 225W vs 180W.
- ❌54.9% longer card at 268mm vs 173mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,064 vs 12,600).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Arc A750 better than GeForce GTX 1060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 113 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 378 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 340 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A750 and GeForce GTX 1060

Arc A750
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A750 scores 12,600 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the Arc A750 leads by 25.2%. The Arc A750 is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Arc A750) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,600+25% | 10,064 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 TFLOPS+94% | 8.873 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+38% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 112+75% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+40% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A750 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The Arc A750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A750) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060) — a 166.7% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A750) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+167% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Arc A750) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Xe Media Engine | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A750 draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Arc A750) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: 8-pin + 6-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 268mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 180W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 400W-38% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin + 6-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 268mm | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 56.0 | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 launched at $289 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 13.8% less ($40 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 43.6 (Arc A750) vs 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the Arc A750 offers 7.9% better value. The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $249-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.6+8% | 40.4 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GP104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #212 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













