GeForce GTX 780 vs Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

7957

G3D Mark Score

10858

Performance Difference

Quadro RTX 3000 is 36.5% faster than GeForce GTX 780

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 7806144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
30%
low82%
medium60%
high20%
ultra10%
1440pLow
15%
low60%
medium20%
high10%
ultra4%
4KLimited
7%
low20%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 7,957 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Quadro RTX 30006144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
46%
low84%
medium77%
high44%
ultra22%
1440pLow
26%
low77%
medium44%
high22%
ultra6%
4KLow
13%
low44%
medium22%
high6%
ultra6%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 10,858 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Quadro RTX 3000 performs 36.5% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 780 and Quadro RTX 3000.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 780 and Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:192
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:192 kB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:863 MHz
Boost Clock:900 MHz
Shading Units:2304
Max Temperature:95 Β°C
Transistor Count:7,080 million
Texture Fill Rate:173.2
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):250 Watt
Floating Point Performance:4.156 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GK110
Architecture:Kepler (2012βˆ’2018)
Launch Price:$649
Release Date:May 23 2013
Performance Ranking Position:320
NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 3000

The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It includes 72 ray tracing cores. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:96
TMUs:288
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:4.5 MB
L2 Cache:6 MB
Core Clock:1395 MHz
Boost Clock:1770 MHz
Tensor Cores:576
Shading Units:4608
Transistor Count:18,600 million
Ray Tracing Cores:72
Texture Fill Rate:509.8
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):260 Watt
Floating Point Performance:16.31 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU102
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Launch Price:$9,999
Release Date:August 13 2018
Performance Ranking Position:78

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 780 and Quadro RTX 3000