
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX Titan across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX Titan
2013Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 780
2013GeForce GTX Titan
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX Titan across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX Titan better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 make more sense than GeForce GTX Titan?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce GTX Titan

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX Titan
GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the GeForce GTX Titan reaches 8,181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX Titan uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 876 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,181+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2688+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 4.709 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz+3% | 876 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192 | 224+17% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 224 KB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 (GeForce GTX Titan). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX Titan's 250W — a 0% difference. The GeForce GTX Titan is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 600W (GeForce GTX Titan). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 32.7+3% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999. The GeForce GTX 780 costs 50.1% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 8.2 (GeForce GTX Titan) — the GeForce GTX 780 offers 93.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX Titan |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-50% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9+94% | 8.2 |
| Codename | GK110 | GK110 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | February 19 2013 |
| Ranking | #320 | #311 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













