
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 780
2013GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅34.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 250W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌117.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 92 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) reaches 8,160 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1890 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,160+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 11.61 TFLOPS+179% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1890 MHz+110% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+50% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)'s 115W — a 74% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 115W-54% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 71.0+123% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GK110 | AD107 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #320 | #102 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













