
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅14.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌117.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 34.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.9 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 780: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 780 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅14.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.9 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 780: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 780 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌117.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 34.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 780 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon RX 580 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
Radeon RX 580 (móvel)
The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1077 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,000 points. Launch price was $301.69.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) reaches 8,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4.963 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1077 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,000 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 4.963 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1077 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+33% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 576 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 780 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce GTX 780 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+13% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 580 (móvel)'s 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 350W (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 80.0+152% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) launched at $229. The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) costs 54.1% less ($270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 34.9 (Radeon RX 580 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 580 (móvel) offers 119.5% better value. The Radeon RX 580 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 580 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $229-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 34.9+119% |
| Codename | GK110 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #320 | #338 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













