
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅37.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅37.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 149.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 780 better than Radeon Pro 5500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5500 XT make more sense than GeForce GTX 780?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+50% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+30% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1757 MHz+95% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+100% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 125W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 63.3+99% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 60.1% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers 149.7% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $199-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 39.7+150% |
| Codename | GK110 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #320 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













