
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 470/570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌178.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Radeon RX 470/570
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅2.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌178.8% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 470/570 better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 make more sense than Radeon RX 470/570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 89 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon RX 470/570

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 470/570
Radeon RX 470/570
The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon RX 470/570 reaches 7,935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1206 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 7,935 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 4.94 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1206 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+50% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470/570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 470/570 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 66.1+108% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470/570 costs 64.1% less ($320 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 178.6% better value. The Radeon RX 470/570 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | Radeon RX 470/570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $179-64% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.9 | 44.3+179% |
| Codename | GK110 | Ellesmere |
| Release | May 23 2013 | August 4 2016 |
| Ranking | #320 | #315 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













