GeForce GTX 780 vs Radeon RX 470/570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

2013Core: 863 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon RX 470/570

2016Core: 926 MHzBoost: 1206 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 780

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 470/570 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 178.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$179 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon RX 470/570

2016

Why buy it

  • 2.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $320 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Delivers 178% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 15.9 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 470/570 better than GeForce GTX 780?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. Radeon RX 470/570 averages 2.5% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 7,957 vs 7,935 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon RX 470/570 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (120W vs 250W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 780 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon RX 470/570 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $179 MSRP. Radeon RX 470/570 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 470/570 is about $320 cheaper on MSRP at $179 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and you are getting 2.5% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (7,935 vs 7,957). GeForce GTX 780 is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX 780 make more sense than Radeon RX 470/570?
Yes. GeForce GTX 780 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $499 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX 470/570. The trade-off is that Radeon RX 470/570 currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (7,935 vs 7,957) and 2.5% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 178%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
1080p
low78 FPS102 FPS
medium67 FPS86 FPS
high54 FPS72 FPS
ultra36 FPS48 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS89 FPS
medium60 FPS74 FPS
high43 FPS54 FPS
ultra27 FPS36 FPS
4K
low25 FPS36 FPS
medium24 FPS32 FPS
high16 FPS20 FPS
ultra14 FPS17 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
1080p
low181 FPS132 FPS
medium152 FPS111 FPS
high115 FPS90 FPS
ultra83 FPS64 FPS
1440p
low123 FPS80 FPS
medium92 FPS62 FPS
high68 FPS47 FPS
ultra48 FPS34 FPS
4K
low53 FPS34 FPS
medium42 FPS26 FPS
high36 FPS21 FPS
ultra27 FPS15 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
1080p
low358 FPS357 FPS
medium286 FPS286 FPS
high239 FPS238 FPS
ultra179 FPS179 FPS
1440p
low269 FPS268 FPS
medium215 FPS214 FPS
high179 FPS179 FPS
ultra134 FPS134 FPS
4K
low179 FPS179 FPS
medium143 FPS143 FPS
high119 FPS119 FPS
ultra90 FPS89 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
1080p
low214 FPS222 FPS
medium179 FPS193 FPS
high143 FPS156 FPS
ultra118 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low166 FPS172 FPS
medium141 FPS152 FPS
high109 FPS118 FPS
ultra88 FPS97 FPS
4K
low94 FPS96 FPS
medium73 FPS76 FPS
high58 FPS61 FPS
ultra44 FPS48 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and Radeon RX 470/570

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 780

The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon RX 470/570

The Radeon RX 470/570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1206 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,935 points. Launch price was $179.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the Radeon RX 470/570 reaches 7,935 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 470/570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470/570). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4.94 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470/570). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1206 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
G3D Mark Score
7,957
7,935
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2304+13%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.156 TFLOPS
4.94 TFLOPS+19%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1206 MHz+34%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
192+50%
128
L1 Cache
192 KB
512 KB+167%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 780 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 470/570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 470/570 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 470/570 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470/570) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s+29%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+50%
256-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 470/570). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.0
Vulkan
1.0
1.3+30%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470/570). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 470/570).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 470/570's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon RX 470/570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 450W (Radeon RX 470/570). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
TDP
250W
120W-52%
Recommended PSU
600W
450W-25%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
6-pin
Length
267mm
240mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
31.8
66.1+108%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 780 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 470/570 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 470/570 costs 64.1% less ($320 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 15.9 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 44.3 (Radeon RX 470/570) — the Radeon RX 470/570 offers 178.6% better value. The Radeon RX 470/570 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 780Radeon RX 470/570
MSRP
$499
$179-64%
Performance per Dollar
15.9
44.3+179%
Codename
GK110
Ellesmere
Release
May 23 2013
August 4 2016
Ranking
#320
#315