
GeForce GTX 780
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780
2013Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.
GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 780
2013GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
2016Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 250W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌212.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 780 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) better than GeForce GTX 780?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 780 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 159 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 and GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780
The GeForce GTX 780 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,957 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points. Launch price was $237.11.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 scores 7,957 and the GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) reaches 8,160 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780) vs 4.275 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1708 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,957 | 8,160+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+80% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS | 4.275 TFLOPS+3% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1708 MHz+90% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 480 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 780 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 780 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+50% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 780) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1+10% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 780) vs NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)'s 80W — a 103% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel)). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 80W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.8 | 102.0+221% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 | GeForce GTX 1060 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GK110 | GP106 |
| Release | May 23 2013 | August 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #320 | #343 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













