GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

12747

G3D Mark Score

12615

Performance Difference

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is 1.0% faster than Radeon Pro WX 8200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti6144 MB
016GB32GB
1080pMedium
45%
low83%
medium76%
high43%
ultra21%
1440pLow
29%
low76%
medium43%
high21%
ultra15%
4KLow
12%
low43%
medium21%
high5%
ultra5%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

6 GB VRAM Β· 12,747 G3D Mark (mid-range)

1080pMedium settings. Stable 60 FPS in most games.
1440pLow settings required. Consider 1080p instead.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT limited to 1080p with DLSS Performance mode.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Radeon Pro WX 82008192 MB
016GB32GB
1080pHigh
56%
low87%
medium84%
high62%
ultra29%
1440pMedium
38%
low84%
medium62%
high29%
ultra22%
4KLow
18%
low62%
medium29%
high12%
ultra6%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

8 GB VRAM Β· 12,615 G3D Mark (mid-range)

1080pHigh settings for most AAA titles at 60 FPS.
1440pMedium settings recommended. May drop below 60 FPS.
4KLow settings only. Upscaling strongly recommended.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT limited to 1080p with DLSS Performance mode.

πŸš€Upscaling: Balanced mode: +40-50% FPS. Helps at 1440p/4K.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti performs 1.0% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 8200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 8200

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:96
Vram:6144 MB
L1 Cache:1.5 MB
L2 Cache:1536 kB
Core Clock:1500 MHz
Boost Clock:1770 MHz
Shading Units:1536
Transistor Count:6,600 million
Texture Fill Rate:169.9
Manufacturing Process:12 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):120 Watt
Floating Point Performance:5.437 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:TU116
Architecture:Turing (2018βˆ’2022)
Launch Price:$279
Release Date:February 22 2019
Performance Ranking Position:204
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 8200

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:64
TMUs:224
Vram:8192 MB
L1 Cache:896 kB
L2 Cache:4 MB
Core Clock:1200 MHz
Boost Clock:1500 MHz
Shading Units:3584
Transistor Count:12,500 million
Texture Fill Rate:336.0
Manufacturing Process:14 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):230 Watt
Floating Point Performance:10.75 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:Vega 10
Architecture:GCN 5.0 (2017βˆ’2020)
Launch Price:$999
Release Date:August 13 2018
Performance Ranking Position:210

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 8200