
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅16.0% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅16.0% more average FPS across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design across 34 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 532 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 144 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1095 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,766 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,766 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 6.447 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1095 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 12,766 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2944+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 6.447 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+62% | 1095 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 184+92% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2.9 MB+93% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12 (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs NVENC 6 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 6 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 40% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 0W (GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 2080 with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 80W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2 | 159.6+50% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












