
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅6.5% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅6.5% more average FPS across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti across 41 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 532 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 117 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 14 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,209 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile reaches 13,209 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 1,792 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 9.032 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2520 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 13,209+4% |
| Architecture | Turing | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1792+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 9.032 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2520 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 96+71% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.8 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 24 MB (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile) — the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 24 MB+1500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile's 35W — a 109.7% difference. The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 35W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2 | 377.4+255% |
Value Analysis
The RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | — |
| Codename | TU116 | GB207 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | March 19 2025 |
| Ranking | #204 | #244 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












