G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 120W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌50% higher power demand at 120W vs 80W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 45.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 12,747 vs 12,675 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 6 GB and better upscaling support with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $279 MSRP. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $279 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (80W vs 120W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

Yes. Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (80W vs 120W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti currently gives you 0.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmark Check

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	98 FPS	163 FPS
medium	88 FPS	145 FPS
high	76 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	143 FPS
medium	77 FPS	122 FPS
high	66 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	68 FPS
medium	41 FPS	59 FPS
high	30 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	269 FPS	193 FPS
medium	227 FPS	158 FPS
high	170 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	114 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	143 FPS
medium	156 FPS	114 FPS
high	124 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	106 FPS	79 FPS
medium	89 FPS	64 FPS
high	72 FPS	56 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	574 FPS	570 FPS
medium	459 FPS	456 FPS
high	382 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	285 FPS
1440p
low	430 FPS	428 FPS
medium	344 FPS	342 FPS
high	287 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	287 FPS	285 FPS
medium	229 FPS	228 FPS
high	191 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	143 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
1080p
low	401 FPS	247 FPS
medium	326 FPS	214 FPS
high	263 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	330 FPS	189 FPS
medium	268 FPS	167 FPS
high	206 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	109 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	112 FPS
medium	119 FPS	94 FPS
high	107 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design

The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,675 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design reaches 12,675 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 3,072 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	12,747	12,675
Architecture	Turing	Turing
Process Node	12 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536	3072+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz+31%	1350 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	192+100%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB	3 MB+100%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 4 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 4)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	16 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	4 MB+167%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 40% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
TDP	120W	80W-33%
Recommended PSU	450W-10%	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2	158.4+49%